Australia stands alone with its massive housing bubble. Home price growth there has outpaced gains in most developed countries.
As well, increasing private sector debts threaten the stability of Australia’s financial system.
Is Australia’s housing and debt bubble likely to cause a financial crisis?
Readers will be familiar with concerns about the Canadian housing bubble and household debts — warnings from authorities seem to come every week.
But there’s another country — Australia — that has an even bigger bubble:
Sources: National sources, BIS Residential Property Price database
Since 1995 housing prices have quadrupled in Australia while “only” tripling in Canada.
And it’s not just house prices. The household debt that comes along with inflated house prices could be a more severe problem.
If those concerns weren’t enough, there’s another imbalance in Australia. Non-financial corporations have made themselves vulnerable by taking on too much debt, leading to worry about their ability to service that debt.
Source: Bank for International Settlements
The lower right panel shows that Australian corporations are stretched in their ability to service their debts, at about 10% above their previous average. Note that Canada is keeping up in that trend too.
Australian households are comfortable taking on more debt.
Source: Bank for International Settlements
Australia (lower right panel) went through 120% household debt to GDP, surpassing Canada at “just” 100% GDP.
Australia pushed its economy onwards and upwards with debt, primarily to the household sector but also for the business sector. The size of total private sector debt, at 200 per cent of GDP, means that more and more credit needs to be advanced to keep GDP growth going.
Here’s Steve Keen, Professor of Economics, at Kingston University, London and author:
“So Australia can’t avoid a crisis by merely stabilizing its level of private debt to GDP: to avoid a crisis—or rather to delay it even further—Australia’s private debt has to keep growing faster than GDP forever.”
Keen provides mathematical examples, confirming that a slowdown and a crisis must come.
The same logic applies to Canada. In fact, total private sector debt grew faster in Canada:
Private debt levels in countries that maintained positive credit during the Global Financial Crisis (GFC)
Source: Professor Steve Keen
Australians and Canadians were very proud of their ability to sail through the GFC with barely a ripple on the water; a mild recession in Canada and none in Australia. But with that pride came complacency and increasing debt loads.
And that debt will be the problem. As Keen points out, the total private sector debt pile has to keep growing at ever faster rates, because interest and amortization payments increase faster than GDP. So it’s impossible to continue at this pace as servicing debt will eventually overwhelm the economy, even if we make the unrealistic assumption that interest rates never go up.
So far, the policy of debt-driven growth has worked, creating some big winners. In Australia (and Canada), as credit growth continued, the banking sector did very well.
“In Moody’s assessment, risks associated with the housing market have risen sharply in recent years. Latent risks in the housing market have been rising in recent years, because significant house price appreciation in the core housing markets of Sydney and Melbourne has led to very high and rising household indebtedness,” the statement said.
Note that substituting “Toronto” and “Vancouver” for “Sydney” and “Melbourne” makes a perfect fit for Canada.
Moody’s is saying that if the Australian housing bubble bursts (should I say “when”?), the Australian economy and Australian banks will suffer a major setback. Moody’s on Australia:
"The resilience of household balance sheets and, consequently, bank portfolios to a serious economic downturn has not been tested at these levels of private sector indebtedness," it said.
If credit growth turns negative the Australian economy will find it impossible to avoid a financial crisis and a severe recession.
Perhaps the 2008-09 GFC was only delayed for Australia.
The opinions expressed in this report are the opinions of the author and readers should not assume they reflect the opinions or recommendations of Richardson GMP Limited or its affiliates. Assumptions, opinions and estimates constitute the author's judgment as of the date of this material and are subject to change without notice. We do not warrant the completeness or accuracy of this material, and it should not be relied upon as such. Before acting on any recommendation, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, if necessary, seek professional advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The comments contained herein are general in nature and are not intended to be, nor should be construed to be, legal or tax advice to any particular individual. Accordingly, individuals should consult their own legal or tax advisors for advice with respect to the tax consequences to them, having regard to their own particular circumstances.. Richardson GMP Limited is a member of Canadian Investor Protection Fund. Richardson is a trade-mark of James Richardson & Sons, Limited. GMP is a registered trade-mark of GMP Securities L.P. Both used under license by Richardson GMP Limited.